# Savii vs. PeopleKeep Canonical reader page: https://ichrareport.com/compare/savii-vs-peoplekeep/ Publisher: ICHRA Report Originally published: 2026-09-12 Substantively updated: 2026-09-25 Sources checked: 2026-09-25 Data period: Not recorded [Home](https://ichrareport.com/) [Compare](https://ichrareport.com/compare/) Savii vs. PeopleKeep Head-to-head provider review Choosing between Savii and PeopleKeep to help run an ICHRA? Compare their publicly described services, then use the questions below to confirm fees, employee support and launch responsibilities in written proposals. At a glance Review type **Head to head** Evidence period **Sep 2026** Decision **Shortlist fit** By [ICHRA Report](https://ichrareport.com/about/) · Published September 12, 2026 · Updated September 25, 2026 Our take Savii publicly emphasizes a guided modern-team platform, while PeopleKeep offers transparent starting pricing and a straightforward digital HRA administration model that is especially legible for smaller employers. The decision turns on desired service depth, implementation guidance, price visibility, and operational complexity. ## Where the two providers differ What to compare Savii PeopleKeep Public positioning Modern, remote-first, startup, growth, and multi-state teams Small and midsize employers; digital HRA administration Starting pricing Complete schedule not published $25 PEPM + $50 base starting price on reviewed page Opt-out billing Not publicly specified Pricing page states no charge for opted-out employees Employer workflow Contribution management, enrollment tracking, compliance, reporting Digital plan administration, documents, expense tracking, and shopping Service model Guided implementation positioning More self-service-oriented public buying path; verify support scope Research Limited public customer dataset Publishes contribution analysis from PeopleKeep customers Support model Guided employer and employee experience Digital administration; confirm service depth ## Which one should make the shortlist? ### Savii makes more sense when… - You want guided implementation and a modern employer/employee experience. - Your team is distributed or growing and Savii’s public positioning closely matches the workforce. - Savii can justify total price and service depth against the transparent alternative. [Read our Savii review](https://ichrareport.com/providers/savii/) ### PeopleKeep makes more sense when… - Your organization is smaller and starting-price clarity is a major requirement. - You want straightforward digital HRA administration and no opt-out charge as publicly stated. - PeopleKeep’s support, payment, and integration scope is sufficient for your operating model. [Read our PeopleKeep review](https://ichrareport.com/providers/peoplekeep/) ## How we reached this conclusion The public material is enough to compare positioning, visible features, intended customer, and pricing transparency. It is not enough to compare implementation quality, support responsiveness, payment accuracy, or customer outcomes under the same conditions. That is why the most useful conclusion is not “one company wins.” It is which provider has the stronger reason to enter the next round for a particular employer. ## Questions to take into both demos - What is the complete annual price for the same eligible and enrolled census? - How are premiums paid, monitored, reconciled, and recovered after failure? - Which HRIS and payroll integrations work for the employer’s exact configuration? - Who gives employees licensed plan-selection help, and during what hours? - What implementation timeline and service commitments become contractual? - What customer results can be verified for a workforce like ours? ### Bottom line PeopleKeep is easier to benchmark economically from public information; Savii presents a more guided modern-team story. That does not decide quality. The buyer should require Savii to make its price and service value measurable and require PeopleKeep to prove that its operating scope is sufficient for the employer’s complexity. ## Sources used for this comparison [1 Savii — Savii — Modern ICHRA benefits platform Provider-published overview of its platform, plan-shopping experience, administration, and support model. Source reviewed 2026-08-16](https://savii.ai/)[2 Savii — Solutions for Employers Provider-published documentation for contribution management, enrollment tracking, compliance workflows, reporting, and intended employer segments. Source reviewed 2026-09-11](https://savii.ai/solutions-for-employers)[3 Savii — About ICHRA Provider-published description of implementation, documentation, substantiation, and employer use cases. Source reviewed 2026-08-16](https://savii.ai/about-ichra)[4 Savii — Book a Savii demo Provider page addressing employers, employees, and brokers. Source reviewed 2026-08-16](https://savii.ai/lets-talk)[5 PeopleKeep — PeopleKeep pricing Provider-published ICHRA pricing starting at $25 per employee per month plus a $50 base fee, with no charge for employees who opt out. The page also specifies a three-seat minimum and seat fees for account administrators; confirm the total quote. Source reviewed 2026-09-25](https://www.peoplekeep.com/pricing)[6 PeopleKeep — PeopleKeep ICHRA administration Provider-published product overview for digital HRA administration, shopping, documentation, and expense tracking. Source reviewed 2026-09-11](https://www.peoplekeep.com/individual-coverage-hra-ichra)[7 PeopleKeep — PeopleKeep ICHRA contribution reporting Provider-customer dataset and contribution analysis. Useful as a directional benchmark, not a census of the full ICHRA market. Source reviewed 2026-08-16](https://www.peoplekeep.com/blog/ichra-report) Review dates are recorded for each source above. Company pages are useful for confirming how a product is described, but they do not prove service quality or customer results.