How to use itStart with the employer’s size, geography, internal capacity, and desired service model. Then narrow the list to the providers that appear capable of handling the actual implementation. Price should be compared only after every company is quoting the same workforce and scope.
Provider
Where it appears to fit best
What pricing is public
SaviiGuided modern-team platform Remote, growing, and multi-state employers that want a guided launch
No complete public schedule found
Small employers through enterprise; strong public education and enrollment support
$25+ PEPM plus $40+ platform for 1–49; custom PEPM and $100+ platform for 50+
Midsize and enterprise employers with complex integrations or service needs
Custom quote
Small and midsize employers that value simple administration and price visibility
Starts at $25 PEPM plus a $50 base fee on the reviewed page
ThatchHealth wallet and platform APIs Technology-forward employers and software platforms
Standard four-person example $230/month; Custom ten-enrolled minimum $2,400/year
Generally 200+ eligible employees and consultant-led implementations
Custom quote
ZorroICHRA administrator and plan-selection platform Employers and brokers evaluating guided individual-plan selection
No complete public administrator fee schedule verified
benefitbayICHRA administrator with broker and carrier-facing operations Brokers and employers needing guided enrollment and payment operations
No complete public administrator fee schedule verified
Brokers evaluating an ICHRA implementation partner
No complete public administrator fee schedule verified
StretchDollarHRA administrator with separate employer and broker pricing Smaller employers comparing a clearly stated base and active-employee fee
Employer: $100 monthly base plus $25 per active employee on the reviewed page; broker portal is a separate $99 monthly offer
NexbenICHRA platform using named integration and shopping partners Employers asking for an integrated shopping and HRIS workflow
No complete public administrator fee schedule verified
GravieMulti-product benefits company with an ICHRA/CHOICE offering Employers comparing an ICHRA-specific service with group alternatives
No complete public CHOICE/ICHRA administrator fee schedule verified
Flyte HCMICHRA service marketer; administration and partner boundaries require confirmation Employers assessing an HRA alongside HR and payroll services
Pricing guide requires a form; no numeric administrator fee verified on the inspected page
DeciselyICHRA-related benefits channel; administrator status not publicly verified A candidate for further diligence, not an established like-for-like administrator
ICHRA administrator fee and responsible entity not publicly verified
These public sources describe different roles: administrators, broker-distributed services, payment-oriented platforms and a scoped benefits-channel entry. PeopleKeep and Remodel Health are related brands. Decisely's administrator role is not publicly verified in this review. Take Command, Thatch, PeopleKeep and StretchDollar expose some fee information, but their billable units and packages differ.
Those differences help build a shortlist, but they do not decide the purchase. The winner for one employer can be the wrong choice for another because local insurance markets, workforce size, internal capacity, payment needs, and support expectations vary.
Complete priceWhat is the annual cost for the same eligible and enrolled census?
ImplementationWho owns the timeline, data cleanup, notices, enrollment, and launch?
PaymentsHow are premiums paid and recovered when a transaction fails?
IntegrationsWhich systems are truly connected for the employer’s exact configuration?
SupportWho helps employees choose plans and resolve coverage problems?
ResultsWhat outcomes can be shown for employers with a similar workforce?
Most employers should bring two or three providers into a structured evaluation. Give each company the same census, contribution assumptions, implementation requirements, and service questions. Ask for the same pricing format and the same type of customer references. That is the only way to turn a public comparison into a defensible buying decision.
Review dates are recorded for each source above. Company pages are useful for confirming how a product is described, but they do not prove service quality or customer results.